What are the downsides of "collaborative divorce"? Does the idea of"collaborative divorce" pose ethical drawbacks and potential malpractice minefields for the unwary practitioner?
Lawyers who take part in the “collaborative divorce" motion use procedures borrowed from established alternative dispute resolution processes to resolve family law disputes without litigation. If you are searching for Family mediation Munich (also known as Familienmediation Mnchen in German Language) you may go through the web.
Image Source: Google
But unlike more approved dispute resolution processes, in “collaborative divorce" the attorneys and their customers agree that they won't take part in proper discovery, will voluntarily disclose information, and will settle the case without court intervention of any type.
Very good Lawyers Routinely Practice Cooperatively
Even the most avid fans of “collaborative divorce" concedes that the notion of settling cases instead of litigating them is hardly book. Capable family law professionals have always led their effort and imagination toward reaching agreement instead of duking it out in court.
It is not news to anybody that lawsuit is costly – sometimes prohibitively so – and the most satisfactory settlements derive from proficient negotiation between competent counsel as opposed to a court-imposed settlement of contested issues.
Courtesy: The dedication of attorneys and parties to deal with each other courteously isn't a brand new one. Capable attorneys always endeavor to function cooperatively with opposing counsel to identify and value assets, place and meet scheduling deadlines, and facilitate resolution of this situation. They honor legitimate places taken by another party and invite their customers to be respectful and realistic too.